Thursday 2 December 2021
 
Failed opening... BBC Arabic RSS feed channel
WayBackMachine takes you to the internet history
Here you can acces to MiddleEast Transparent website History

Old site is Arabic Windows Coding


Sultan’s Death Tests Saudi Succession Mechanisms

Monday 24 October 2011



Tomorrow, October 25, Riyadh will hold a funeral for Crown Prince Sultan of Saudi Arabia, who died in a New York City hospital on Friday. Although his death was not unexpected — he had suffered from colon cancer and dementia — his passing will test the kingdom’s opaque political structures at a particularly challenging time.

Theoretically, the Allegiance Council, a body established by King Abdullah in 2006, will choose the next crown prince. Although the body’s notional purpose is to formalize the system of succession, its creation had an important political context, well known but not publicly announced — it was Abdullah’s attempt to outflank the so-called Sudairi Seven, the largest group of full brothers among the more than thirty sons of Ibn Saud, the kingdom’s founder, who have dominated the government for the past forty years. Indeed, there has been little love lost between Abdullah and his Sudairi half-brothers, namely, King Fahd (who died in 2005), Sultan (who was the long-serving minister of defense and aviation as well as deputy prime minister and crown prince), Abdulrahman (the vice minister of defense and aviation), Nayef (the minister of interior and second deputy prime minister), Turki (who has lived in semi-exile in Cairo), Salman (the governor of Riyadh province), and Ahmed (the vice minister of interior).

One of the few sons of Ibn Saud without full brothers, Abdullah has long believed that the Sudairis question his ability and seniority in the royal family. Sultan wanted to be made crown prince in 1982 when Fahd became king, but other princes challenged this and supported Abdullah. In the end, Sultan had to settle for being made second deputy prime minister and being perceived as crown-prince-in-waiting. In 1992, King Fahd announced the Basic Law of Governance, which included the line, "The King chooses the heir apparent and relieves him [of his duties] by royal order." Abdullah saw this clause as threatening his right to the throne.

Indeed, after Fahd suffered a debilitating stroke in 1995, the Sudairis blocked many of Abdullah’s initiatives and allowed him to hold the title of regent only briefly, in 1996. When he became king upon Fahd’s death in 2005, Abdullah took his revenge by refusing to allow Nayef to become second deputy prime minister, arguing that the prince’s then uncertain health justified the decision. He eventually relented, however, appointing Nayef to the post in 2009.

Notionally, both the Allegiance Council Law and the composition of the council itself (i.e., the king’s half-brothers and the senior sons of deceased half-brothers) allow Abdullah to nominate rival candidates for crown prince, followed by secret deliberations and some sort of vote (for details on both the law and the council, see pages 30-34 of "After King Abdullah: Succession in Saudi Arabia," available at http://washingtoninstitute.org/temp...). Yet Nayef is almost certain to insist that he be chosen. He has years of administrative experience and, now with better health, appears fitter than any older rival.

Given Abdullah’s own weak health — he is eighty-eight and had yet another back operation earlier this month — Nayef already appears to be the day-to-day ruler and future king. Notably hardline on social issues such as allowing women to vote and drive, which Abdullah supports, Nayef seems to agree with the king on the threats posed by Iran and Saudi Arabia’s Shiite minority.

Given these factors, Nayef’s formal elevation should become clear within a few days. In addition to the announcement of a new defense minister — likely Sultan’s brother Abdulrahman rather than his son Khaled — there may well be other important ministerial appointments. Yet the official news releases will probably not tell the full story, or perhaps even the true one. For example, the obituary of Prince Sultan published by the state-run Saudi Press Agency declared that he was born in 1931. In a 2005 release, however, it reported that he was born in 1930. And most analysts believe the true date was 1924.

Simon Henderson is the Baker fellow and director of the Gulf and Energy Policy Program at The Washington Institute.


print article without comments
Print article
print article with comments
Print article with comments
Send to a friend
envoi par email



metransparent.com Ranking in Google PageRank Checker
PageRank



Not yet registered ?



Be actor of this website. When registered and logged in you can write and publish directly your articles at this website very easily



Subscribe to our Newsletter and stay tuned of latest news




Donate



 
 
©Middle East transparent© This site is developed by Middle East Transparent team - 2007-2009.  This site is best seen at resolution 1024x768 and over  ©Middle East transparent©

10 visitors now